Juster Steel v. Carlson Companies
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
The trial court dismissed Count I of appellant’s complaint as barred by the statute of limitations, Counts II and IV on grounds of insufficient particularity in the pleading, or alternatively failure to state a claim, and granted summary judgment on Count III. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Juster Steel and respondent Carlson entered into a purchase agreement for property in Hennepin County on February 20, 1976. As a condition to the agreément, Carlson agreed to undertake necessary excavation and landfill to accommodate the construction of a building along the southern…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Riley v. Cordis Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Cox v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- TROOIEN v. MansourCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Schumacher v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Stead-Bowers v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.