Legal Opinion
Riley v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 5, 2009No. Case 08-CV-5031 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 110 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marlyn Riley was implanted with a stent manufactured by defendant Cordis Corporation, a subsidiary of defendant Johnson & Johnson (collectively “Cordis”). Riley later suffered a heart attack because of a blood clot that had formed at the site of his stent. Riley and his wife, Debra Riley, bring state-law claims of negligence, strict liability, breach of express and implied warranties, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and loss of consortium against Cordis. This matter is before the Court on Cordis’s motion for judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Gurman v. Metro Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Dumont v. Reily Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- In Re Bayer Corp. Combination Aspirin Products Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.