Northern States Power Co. v. Franklin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Appeal from an order dismissing alternative counterclaims asserted by defendant Schmidt Investment Company, Inc., hereinafter designated defendant. The order resulted from a motion by plaintiff pursuant to Rule 12.02(5), Rules of Civil Procedure.
The sole issue raised by the appeal is whether the allegations of defendant’s counterclaims were sufficient to withstand a motion for dismissal on the ground that each failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
Defendant’s pleadings were in response to plaintiff’s complaint which alleged that on July 18, 1951, Lydia…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Roberge v. Cambridge Cooperative Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Fritz v. FritzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Schrunk v. AndresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by91 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Group Health Plan, Inc. v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Hauschildt v. BeckinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.