Legal Opinion
Stead-Bowers v. Langley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 4, 2001No. C6-01-423PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT H. SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellant Jeannie Stead-Bowers brought a claim for malicious prosecution against respondents Sandra Langley, Mark Elias, Susan Morris, and the City of Greenwood, as well as John Does 1-10. She subsequently sought to amend her complaint to state claims for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Stead-Bowers challenges the district court’s dismissal of her malicious prosecution action and the denial of her motion to amend. She contends that malicious prosecution extends to actions where there…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Lawrence v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Hill v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Jay Nygard v. City of OronoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- Gregory Sherr v. HealthEast Care SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.