Legal Opinion

Davis v. Re-Trac Manufacturing Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1967No. 40075PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court.

A jury having returned a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for approximately $9,000 in a fraud action, and post-trial motions being denied, the basic issue raised in this court is whether the verdict is sustained by the evidence.

In Hanson v. Ford Motor Co. (8 Cir.) 278 F. (2d) 586, 591, the decisions of the Minnesota Supreme Court are carefully reviewed and the elements of the tort as defined by these decisions are accurately set out as follows:

“1. There must be a representation;
“2. That representation must be false;
“3. It must have to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Spiess v. BrandtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Hollerman v. F. H. Peavey & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Bergquist v. KreidlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Knutson v. Arrigoni Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Florenzano v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Specialized Tours, Inc. v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API