Legal Opinion
Grondahl v. Bulluck
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 1982No. 81-479PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
Plaintiff June A. Grondahl appeals from an order of the St. Louis County District Court granting summary judgment and dismissing her complaint of medical malpractice against defendants Dr. Matthew H. Bulluck and The Duluth Clinic, Ltd. The district court found Mrs. Grondahl’s action barred by the statute of limitations. The only question is whether there exists a genuine issue of material fact concerning the date on which Dr. Bulluck’s treatment of Mrs. Grondahl ceased. We conclude that there does and, therefore, reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff presented the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Abdallah, Inc. v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Clifford H. Robbins v. Milner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Mary Sheets v. Richard G. BurmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- William R. Jewson v. Mayo ClinicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.