Legal Opinion

Schumacher v. Schumacher

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 2001No. C7-00-2039PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Judge

Appellant managed a bar and restaurant owned by respondents, who were his par ents. When respondents began the process to sell the business, he sued, contending that they had orally agreed to give him lifetime employment and to convey the business and related real estate to him upon the first parent’s death. The district court granted summary judgment for respondents, dismissing the breach-of-contract claims under the statute of frauds; dismissing the claim for unjust enrichment as being inadequately pleaded; and dismissing the promissory estoppel claim without specific…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. ServiceMaster of St. Cloud v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Melina v. ChaplinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In re Suboxone (Buprenorphine Hydrochloride & Naloxone) Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. In re Keurig Green Mountain Single-Serve Coffee Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Khoday v. Symantec Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  4. Toomey v. DahlDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  5. Ramette v. Digital River, Inc. (In Re Graphics Technology, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API