Mayer v. Beondo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.
The judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff directing specific performance by defendant of a contract to convey real estate must be reversed.
*667(1) The contract which is in the form of an option provides for the payment of $5,680 in cash less the amount of a trust deed on the property. It appears that approximately $2,500 remained unpaid on the trust deed. The complaint alleges “that plaintiff has duly performed all of the conditions of said agreement on his part to be performed, and has tendered to defendant the purchase price set forth in said option.” This allegation is denied in defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Greiss v. State Investment & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Richter v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Asnon v. FoleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. ToomeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Eatwell v. BeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Beck v. Arthur Murray, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Locklear v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.