Legal Opinion

Lifton v. Harshman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1947No. Civ. 15654PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

The actors in the transaction that is the subject of this appeal whose names will frequently recur in our discussion are as follows: Appellant Sam Lifton, the purchaser, who for a number of years had been engaged in the business of buying and operating apartment houses; respondent Susan B. Harshman, one of the sellers, who during her many years’ residence in Los Angeles has bought, owned and sold a number of houses; respondent Harry T. Harshman, her husband, the other seller, who is not engaged in any active business, being a retired builder; W. P. Anderson, a real estate broker; and Samuel…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Schwartz v. SchwerinArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Smith v. BearCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  4. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Greenstone v. Claretian Theological SeminaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API