Greiss v. State Investment & Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This action is upon a fire insurance policy, and the appeal is taken by the insurance company from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.
Only two points are made here: 1. That the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that in case they find that the proof of loss furnished by plaintiff to the company was false or fraudulent, their verdict should be for the defendant; and 2. In refusing to instruct the jury that plaintiff could not recover if he refused to submit the matter of loss to arbitration; but, on the other hand, instructed the jury that arbitration was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Case v. Manufacturers' Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Mecartney v. Guardian Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.