Legal Opinion
Richter v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1937No. Civ. 5773PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action to terminate the defendants’ interest in a certain oil and gas lease for failure to make payments of royalties as provided in the written agreement whereby the defendants contracted with the plaintiff for purchase of the lease in question.
The action was to recover possession of the leasehold premises, and incidental thereto to recover the value of oil produced and saved therefrom subsequent to the filing of the action. In this connection, Golden Bear Oil Company, Ltd., is joined as a party defendant, that company having…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Lavely v. NonemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Charlesworth v. American Express Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Simone v. McKeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Shell Oil Co. v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.