Boone v. Templeman
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. A. E. Shaw, Leon E. Martin, and Keyes & Martin, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendants, given after a ruling sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint. The sole question presented is the sufficiency of the facts stated in the complaint to constitute a cause of action.
The plaintiff sued to enforce specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, executed by him, as purchaser, and by Templeman as vendor. Mayer is a subsequent purchaser from Templeman, with notice of plaintiff’s rights. The contract of sale was in writing and was executed on October 17, 1901. The price fixed for the land was two thousand…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Cohen v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stow v. RussellIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.