Legal Opinion

Locklear v. Tucker

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1949No. 7428PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

By his complaint in this action the plaintiff alleges that the plaintiff and defendants, Dudley G. Tucker and Nona E. Tucker, entered into a written contract on December 11, 1946, reading as follows:

“Earnest Money Receipt and Option “Dated December 11, 1946.
“Received of A. N. Locklear, of Boise, Idaho, hereinafter called Purchaser, the sum of Four Hundred Fifty and no/100 ($450.00) Dollars, as earnest money and in part payment for the purchase of the following described real estate situate in Canyon County, State of Idaho, to-wit:
“The East Half (Ei/£) of the Southeast Quarter…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Morgan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Matter of City of New York (Upper N.Y. Bay)New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Weber v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Sprouse v. MagesIdaho Supreme Court · 1928

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Suchan v. RutherfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Luke v. ConradIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  4. McCandless v. SchickIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Crouch v. BischoffIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API