Legal Opinion
Asnon v. Foley
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1930No. Docket No. 5909PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GATES, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff sued defendants on a mechanic’s lien to recover for labor and materials furnished. Defendants answered, denying many of the material allegations of the complaint. They also set up a number of affirmative defenses as well as a counterclaim. The findings of the court and its conclusions of law were in favor of plaintiff. Judgment was entered accordingly and from that judgment the defendants appeal.
It is unnecessary to give the facts as found by the trial court since no attack is made on the findings of the court or its conclusions of law. Nor is any question raised…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Boyle v. Coast Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Union Lumber Co. v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Curnow v. GravelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Parker v. Tilghman v. Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Bumgarner v. OrtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Mayer v. BeondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Priebe v. SinclairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.