Legal Opinion
Beck v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 28, 1966No. Civ. 28935PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether or not the trial court properly held defendant Arthur Murray, Inc. liable in damages, as provided by section 1812.94 of the Civil Code, for a violation by its licensee of the provisions of the Dance Act (Civ. Code, §§ 1812.80-1812.95).
Stating the facts most favorably to respondent, as we are required to do on this appeal, the following seem to be clear: Defendant Arthur Murray, Inc. (hereinafter Murray) is a Delaware corporation, having its principal place of business in New York. It licenses sundry dance studios throughout the United States, under…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Reynolds v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Sherman v. Texas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
- Shaw v. JeppsonUtah Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Drexel v. Union Prescription Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Ashland Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Patterson v. Domino's Pizza, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Sheraton Corp. of Am. v. Kingsford Packing Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.