Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Pacenza

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 2006No. SCBD 4983PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatt, C.J.

¶ 1 The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), charged the respondent, Franklin J. Pacenza (Pacenza/at-torney), with two counts of professional misconduct involving a contract of deed executed between Eric and Tina Richards (collectively, Richards) and the attorney covering real property in Creek County, Oklahoma. The Bar Association alleged that the attorney’s actions in regard to the contractual relationship amounted to engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. 1

¶ 2 Upon a de novo review, 2 we hold that clear and convincing evidence 3…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MothershedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. In re Reinstatement of KerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
  4. Arkansas Valley State Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TownsendSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API