Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice:
The single first-impression issue here is whether the Supreme Court — the state government’s organ acting in both the legislative and adjudicative capacity when exercising its constitutionally-derived responsibility for the control and regulation of the practice of law and for the licensing and ethics of legal practitioners — may cast itself in the added role of the bar discipline’s ultimate enforcer by commanding the pros-ecutorial arm of the state bar agency (the Professional Responsibility Commission of the Oklahoma Bar Association) to conduct a second re-investigation of a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by178 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.