Legal Opinion

Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1981No. 55565PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Justice:

The single first-impression issue here is whether the Supreme Court — the state government’s organ acting in both the legislative and adjudicative capacity when exercising its constitutionally-derived responsibility for the control and regulation of the practice of law and for the licensing and ethics of legal practitioners — may cast itself in the added role of the bar discipline’s ultimate enforcer by commanding the pros-ecutorial arm of the state bar agency (the Professional Responsibility Commission of the Oklahoma Bar Association) to conduct a second re-investigation of a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API