Legal Opinion

In re Reinstatement of Kerr

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 2015No. SCBD-6158PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATT, J.;

{1 Robert Samuel Kerr, IV ("Kerr") entered an Alford plea to a misdemeanor charge of obstruction of a public officer on April 5, 2012. He was immediately suspended by the Oklahoma Bar Association ("Bar") and directed to show cause why a final order of discipline should not be imposed or present mitigating evidence, The Professional Responsibility Tribunal ("Tribunal") held a hearing on July 80, 2012. After conducting a de novo review of the Tribunal's recommendations, and giving due consideration to the mitigating factors, we suspended Kerr for two years and a day, beginning on the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Matter of Reinstatement of KaminsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. BesleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. In Re the Reinstatement of PageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF RICKEYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  2. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GILLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  3. In re the Reinstatement of BlakeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF GOFORTHSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
  5. IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF ARNETTSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API