Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Donnelly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1992No. OBAD No. 997. SCBD No. 3717PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Chief Justice.

In this proceeding against a lawyer for imposition of professional discipline the issues to be decided are: (1) Is the record, consisting of the stipulated facts, sufficient for de novo review? (2) Should a lawyer’s incapacity to practice law be considered in a Rule 6 disciplinary proceeding? and (3) Is public reprimand the appropriate disciplinary sanction to be imposed for respondent’s professional misconduct? We answer all the issues in the affirmative.

Patrick Donnelly [Donnelly or respondent], a licensed lawyer, was charged by the Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar or…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. ColstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API