Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Farrant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1994No. SCBD No. 3929. OBAD No. 1112PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Justice:

The complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar Association), alleges two counts of misconduct by the respondent Joe R. Far-rant (Farrani/attorney). The first count relates to conversion of client funds entrusted to Farrant for a specific purpose. 1 The second count involves misrepresentations made to the Bar Association in relation to the facts and circumstances surrounding the grievance. 2 We find that the Bar Association established by clear and convincing evidence 3 that: a) Farrant converted client funds entrusted to him for a specific purpose; and b) that he knowingly…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tweedy v. Oklahoma Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BraswellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. HoldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AlbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API