Legal Opinion
Arkansas Valley State Bank v. Phillips
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 16, 2007No. 104,021PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
{1 The issue presented is whether the district court properly granted the motion to disqualify the defendants' counsel. We find that it did not.
FACTS
T2 The Appellee, Arkansas Valley State Bank (Bank) had contracted with Wilbanks Securities, Inc. (Wilbanks Securities) to provide customers of the Bank with investment counseling and services, which the Bank could not provide legally on the Bank's premises. 1 While the record is unclear, apparent ly when Wilbanks Securities sought to terminate its relationship with the Bank, a dispute arose between the parties about the ownership of certain…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- Miami Business Services, LLC v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- ACCOUNTING PRINCIPALS, INC. v. Manpower, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2008
- JENSEN v. POINDEXTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.