Legal Opinion

Elkin v. Bell Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1977No. 1435PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania has appealed from the order of the lower court refusing its motion for summary judgment.1 Bell contends that there are no remaining issues of fact which the lower court has jurisdiction to decide. For the reasons developed below, we reverse.

A brief exposition of the facts is necessary for a full understanding of the issues and arguments on this appeal. Appellee’s assignor, Studio Photographers, Inc. of Pennsylvania, instituted this action on December 7, 1971, by filing a *507complaint containing four counts. Count One sought compensatory…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Einhorn v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Nagy v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Woytek v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Bell Tel. Co. of Pennsylvania v. SannerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. DiSanto v. Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API