Legal Opinion

Nagy v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1981No. 979PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is an appeal by Robert and Lois Nagy, plaintiffs below, of the order of the trial court sustaining defendants’, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania and Gerald Porto, preliminary objections to all three counts of the plaintiffs’ complaint. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The facts of the case are adequately stated by the court below:

The individual defendant, Gerald Porto, is the estranged husband of Judy Porto, the wife-plaintiff’s sister. As a result of beatings administered by Gerald Porto throughout fourteen years of stormy marriage, Judy Porto was compelled…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Jones v. Nissenbaum, Rudolph & SeidnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Harris by Harris v. Easton Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Thomas J. O'DOnnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Chicarella v. PassantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Doe v. Philadelphia Community Health Alternatives Aids Task ForceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API