Legal Opinion

Einhorn v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1963No. Appeal, No. 382PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

Appellant, an escheator of the Commonwealth, filed a petition for depositions, discovery and inspection,1 in *632the Court of Common Pleas No. 2 of Philadelphia County, naming appellee, Philadelphia Electric Company [Company] as respondent. The Company is a public utility engaged in furnishing electricity to the public at rates fixed in tariffs filed by it with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission [Commission].

The information sought, appellant averred, was relevant to escheat and would substantially aid in the preparation of the pleadings in such proceedings.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Cole v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Blythe Township Municipal Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Stahl v. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Byer v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API