Legal Opinion

Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1976No. 472, 473 and 492PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

We are here concerned with an individual’s recovery of compensatory and punitive damages against the Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania, hereinafter referred to as Bell, for the omission of his name from both the telephone directories distributed by Bell and the directory assistance operators’ lists, and for the disruption of his telephone service. We will reverse and remand for a new trial.

Kenneth W. Behrend, the appellee, was an attorney practicing in Allegheny County in partnership with another attorney, Mark B. Aronson, at all times relevant to this appeal. In 1966 he…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Smith v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. GLENN v. Point Park CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Bash v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Valhal Corp. v. Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects, Planners, EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  5. Schipani v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1981

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API