Legal Opinion

Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1961No. Appeal, 204PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Cohen,

The Borough of Lansdale, appellant, sought a declaratory judgment in the court below to assert its exclusive right under the authority of The Borough Code, 1 to sell electricity in an area recently annexed by the Borough but presently serviced by the Philadelphia Electric Company ('Company), appellee.

The lower court dismissed the petition on the grounds that jurisdiction of the subject matter is vested solely in the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, and the Borough appealed.

It is unquestioned that the Public Utility Law gives the Pennsylvania Public Utility…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. York Water Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Fogelsville & Trexlertown Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Bellevue Borough v. Ohio Valley Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. New Brighton Borough v. New Brighton Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Altoona v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API