Legal Opinion
DiSanto v. Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 9, 1981No. 63PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, President Judge:
Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Company [hereinafter Dauphin] takes this appeal from the lower court’s dismissal of its preliminary objections to appellee DiSanto’s complaint. Through its preliminary objections, Dauphin challenged the subject matter jurisdiction of the court of common pleas to hear this controversy. An interlocutory appeal was taken as of right under the former Act of March 5, 1925, P.L. 23, § 1, 12 P.S. § 672 (1953) which was expressly repealed by the Judiciary Act Repealer Act of April 28, 1978, P.L. 202, No. 53, § 2(a) [1069] effective June 27,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pettko v. Pennsylvania American Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Ostrov v. I.F.T., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- County of Erie v. Verizon North, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.