Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell,
This is an appeal from the Decree of the lower Court sustaining preliminary objections of the defendants, The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (hereinafter called “Bell”) and The Reuben H. Donnelley Corporation (hereinafter called “Donnelley”), and dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint in this equity action.
On January 23, 1968, Kenneth W. Behrend, an attorney at law, and Behrend and Aronson, a law partnership, filed a complaint in equity against Bell and Donnelley to compel defendants to republish or amend the 1967 white pages and yellow pages of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3Cited by33 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.