Legal Opinion

Bell Tel. Co. of Pennsylvania v. Sanner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 46PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

This is an appeal by The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania from the order of the lower court dismissing its preliminary objections to appellee’s answer, new matter and counterclaim. 1 For the reasons developed below, we reverse.

The pertinent facts of the case are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows: On August 25,1975, Bell instituted this assumpsit action against appellee Mitchell W. Sanner to recover tariff charges for the telephone services it had provided. Sanner filed an answer, new matter and counterclaim to Bell’s complaint. In his answer, appellee…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Elkin v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Colonial Products Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Morrow v. BELL TELE. CO. OF PENNSYLVANIASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Continental Telephone Co. of Oklahoma v. HunterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  3. DiSanto v. Dauphin Consolidated Water Supply Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Allport Water Authority v. Winburne Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. DeFrancesco v. Western Pennsylvania Water Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API