Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hereford

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1988No. OSB 86-89 and 86-90 SC S29414PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against G. Brock Hereford accusing him of unethical conduct in four separate causes. Causes one and two allege a violation of DR 6-101(B) (“A lawyer shall not neglect a legal matter entrusted to the lawyer.”) Causes three and four allege violations of DR 1-103(C) (“A lawyer who is the subject of a disciplinary investigation shall respond fully and truthfully to inquiries from and comply with reasonable requests of a tribunal or other authority empowered to investigate or act upon the conduct of lawyers, subject only to the exercise of any applicable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CoeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Feinstein v. AFCO Credit Corp. (In Re Krimbel Trucking Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1979
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HerefordOregon Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. In Re WhippleOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ChandlerOregon Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API