In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boyer
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The only real issue in this matter is the nature of the sanction which should be imposed for the accused’s unethical conduct with respect to his failure to exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of certain of his clients.
The Oregon State Bar’s complaint contained two causes. In the first the accused is charged with violation of DR 5-101(A), which provides:
“(A) Except with the consent of his client after full disclosure, a lawyer shall not accept employment if the exercise of his professional judgment on behalf of his client will be or reasonably may be affected by his own…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BanksOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of GaltonOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Frohnmayer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MontgomeryOregon Supreme Court · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re ClaussenOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of VaileOregon Supreme Court · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.