In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Vaile
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The Oregon State Bar filed a complaint against Craig A. Vaile accusing him of unethical conduct in four separate causes. The first three causes arise chiefly from Vaile’s alleged representation of Linda Shawcross. The fourth cause arises from Vaile’s alleged failure to respond to the Bar’s inquiries concerning the circumstances that gave rise to the first three causes.
The Trial Panel found that Vaile was guilty of the first, second and fourth causes and not guilty of the third cause of complaint. It determined that Vaile be suspended for a period of one year but that the execution of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HolmanOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BrandsnessOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of BoyerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of O'ByrneOregon Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. BullisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re JaffeeOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of RhodesOregon Supreme Court · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.