Legal Opinion

Stiles v. City State Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 21, 1916No. 6848PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Oklahoma County;' Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Action by the City State Bank against George Stiles and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CLAY, C.

For convenience the parties hereto will be designated “plaintiff” and “defendants” as in the trial court. The plaintiff, City State Bank, brought a replevin action in the superior court of Oklahoma county for possession of one Michigan automobile, 40 horse power, model R., claiming a special ownership by virtue of a chattel mortgage given by George Stiles, one of the defendants, in which the property mortgaged was described as “three new Michigan automobiles forty horse power, money being advanced for the purchase price of these machines.” Defendants gave redelivery bond,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Rowley v. JewettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  2. Schmidt v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  3. King v. C. Aultman & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  4. Muse v. LehmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  5. Watts v. First National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. StilesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Boys v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Hillery v. Waurika Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. First Nat. Bk. of Brookfield v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Wilson Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API