Legal Opinion

Wilson Co. v. Russell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 18, 1930No. 19293PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLETON, O.

L. W. Russell,, as plaintiff below, brought this action against Wilson & Company, defendant below, for the sum of '$214.20 and costs for conversion of approximately 50 turkeys on which the plaintiff had a mortgage, which mortgage was duly filed. He alleged that the defendant took the turkeys from the mortgagors, slaughtered and shipped them to some eastern market. The defendant filed a general denial. On trial the plaintiff prevailed; the defendant appeals.

The parties will -be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

Tbe defendant relies, in its brief, first, ou error of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Oxsheer v. WattTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Avery v. I. Popper & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Corbin v. KincaidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  5. McClintock v. ParishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Texas Co. v. ForsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  3. Shefts Supply, Inc. v. FischerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API