Schmidt v. Bender
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Rush District Court. Replevin, by Bender against Schmidt and three others, to recover the possession of two mules. Judgment for the plaintiff, at the May term, 1886. The defendants bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This was an action of replevin, brought by George Bender against Peter Schmidt, George Laudner, James Lawson, and George Strobel, to recover the possession of two mules. George Bender and Reinhardt Borgert were both *438residents of Russell county, and on October 22, 1883, Borgert, being indebted to Bender in a considerable sum of money, executed a chattel mortgage upon the mules in question and other personal property, to secure the payment of the debt. The mortgage, which was duly filed in the office of the register of deeds, stipulated that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Raper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
- King v. C. Aultman & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Adams v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by13 opinions
- City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Redinger v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. FranciscoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Dierling v. PettitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- Nielsen v. HylandUtah Supreme Court · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.