Legal Opinion

Hillery v. Waurika Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1924No. 12825PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, 0.

The parties-will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiff and defendants as they were designated in the trial court. ,

On the 11th day of April, 191S, one T. E. Young mortgaged to the plaintiff an automobile ' described as “1 1918 Model Eord Car, now,” and other chattels, as security for the payment of a promissory note for $680 of that dato, due October 14, 1918, and bearing interest at the rate of ton per cent, per annum. This mortgage was filed in the office of the county clerk of Jefferson county on tho 16th day of April, 1918. Afterward Young traded this car to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Watts v. First National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Stiles v. City State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Gerlach Bank of Woodward v. HerdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Westmoreland Manganese Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1955
  2. Phelan v. Stock Yards BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. National Bond & Inv. Co. v. Central Nat. Bank of EnidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Gripe v. SinorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Harp v. First Nat. Bank of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API