King v. C. Aultman & Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. Eeplevin brought by Aultman & Co. against King, for the recovery of a certain mare. Trial at the January Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for the plaintiffs. King brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action of replevin brought by C. Aultman & Co., against John P. King, for the recovery of a cei’tain mare, described as follows: “One bay mare, one hind foot white, and white spot in face, branded *247*G,’ 17 hands high, 5 years old, formerly the property of John Hamerberg.” John Hamerberg did, in fact, once own the property, and the plaintiffs now claim the property by virtue of a chattel mortgage given by Charles H. Camp and said John Hamerberg to them, and the defendant claims the property by virtue of a purchase of the same…
2Cited by12 opinions
- City National Bank v. Goodloe-McClelland Commission Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Tolbert v. HortonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Schmidt v. BenderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Ehrke v. TuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- First National Bank of Redfield v. KoechelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.