Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Stiles

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 20, 1920No. 9665PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from' District Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by Walter D. Caldwell against George Stiles and others on supersedeas bond given in replevin action. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by Walter D. Caldwell to recover on a certain supersedeas bond, executed by George Stiles and Catherine Stiles as principals and Whit M. Grant and A. F. Connellee as sureties. The material facts may be summarized as follows: George Stiles and Catherine 'Stiles executed a note to the City State Bank and secured the same -by executing a chattel mortgage on one “Michigan Automobile.” After default was made on said note, the City State Bank brought a replevin action against George Stiles and Catherine Stiles for the recovery of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Washington Ice Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Leeper, Graves & Co. v. First Nat. Bank of HobartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Morris v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Yelton v. SlinkardIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Fair v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gerber v. WehnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Dew v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Yellow Mfg. Acceptance Corp. v. FinnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Lierly v. Motor Mtg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API