Muse v. Lehman
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Harvey District Court. At the September Term, 1879, of the district court, plaintiff Lehman recovered a judgment against Muse, Spivey & Co., who bring it here for review. The facts appear in Muse v. Wafer, 29 Kas. 279, et seq., and in the opinion herein.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This action was commenced before a justice of the peace by S. Lehman, against R. W. P. Muse, R. M. Spivey, and John A. Randall, partners as Muse, Spivey & Co., and after judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants, the defendants appealed the case to the district court, where another trial was had before the court and a jury, and judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendants for $59.55. To reverse this judgment, the defendants below, who are plaintiffs in error, bring the case to this court.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frankhouser v. EllettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Brown v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Duke v. StricklandIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. JenksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- Piazzek v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Bird City State Bank v. Goodland Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. Fourth National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- Stiles v. City State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Acme Feeds, Inc. v. DanielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.