Legal Opinion

City of Lawton v. Sherman MacHine & Iron Works

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 15, 1938No. 26631PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Comanche county upon two eases consolidated therein and tried to the court. Plaintiff recovered judgment upon allegations of balances due it under construction contracts, and the defendant city has perfected the appeal. We will refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in the trial court.

In March, 1930, the defendant city voted .bonds in the sum of $600,000 for waterworks improvements. Thereafter plaintiff contracted with defendant under three separate contracts made under three separate bids to construct such improvements.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Long v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Guild v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Harn v. Interstate Bldg. & L. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Maney v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Oklahoma City v. DerrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. City of Granville v. Kovash, IncorporatedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Foundation International, Inc. v. E.T. Ige Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Jackson Materials Co. v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API