Maney v. Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, V. C. J.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by plaintiffs in error against defendants in error to recover a mon.ey judgment. The controversy grew out of a contract entered into between plaintiffs and defendant wherein plaintiffs were to excavate a bypass for the defendant city. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
Plaintiffs in their petition alleged;
That the bid was based upon maps, drawings, plans, and specifications and sounding sheet and profile, showing the nature and character of the work to be done,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Peter Salvucci & Sons, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Leonard v. Town of WaynesboroSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
- Clark v. City of Humansville, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.