Legal Opinion
Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 31, 1987No. 59824, 59850PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
Eight issues are presented for decision: [1] Does the Oklahoma Board of Public Affairs and the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation [State] owe a duty to disclose a subsurface condition to bidders on a construction project when its contract contains a clause that expressly disallows additional payment or extensions of time for completion of work if the contractor fails to acquaint himself with all conditions relating to the work? [2] Are the parties absolutely bound by a contract provision that makes the engineer’s determination of compliancé with the contract…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Vanderpool v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- TK-7 Corp. v. Estate of BarboutiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Taylor v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.