Legal Opinion
Jackson Materials Co. v. Grand River Dam Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 1945No. 31420PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an action by Jackson Materials Company, a corporation, against the Grand River Dam Authority to recover for certain alleged extra work done as subcontractor in the construction, of the Grand River Dam and power house. Massman Construction Company, of Kansas City, herein referred to as Massman, was the principal contractor. The principal contract provided that the contractor would perform all work and furnish all supplies, with certain exceptions, to construct the dam and power house in accordance with the plans and specifications, under the direction of the engineers employed by the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Dallas v. ShortallTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Woodruff v. . Roch. Pitts. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- United States Rubber Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Lawton v. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, a Corporation v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Bearden v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.