Legal Opinion

Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 27, 1969No. 41154PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice.

This is an action for money judgment and for the establishment and foreclosure of a mechanics’ and materialmen’s lien.

The case arose out of three contracts. The first was a written contract dated April 14, 1961, between the plaintiff in error (hereinafter called “Flour Mills”), owner of the real property involved, and H. T. Petersen, a sole trader doing business as P & M Sales (hereinafter called “Petersen”), as prime contractor, for the construction on Flour Mills’ property in the City of Alva, Oklahoma, of a certain building as an addition to Flour Mills’ grain storage…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Mosler Safe Co. v. Maiden Lane Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Roberts v. Security Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. United States Ex Rel. Gillioz v. John Kerns Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  5. Feeney v. BardsleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. First National Bank of Pauls Valley v. CrudupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  3. State Surety Co. v. Lamb Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  4. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Ray Moody v. The American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Transpower Constructors v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API