Legal Opinion

Long v. Pierce County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1900No. 3190PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thomas Cabboll, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fullerton, J.

On the 19th day of September, 1890, the appellant and respondent entered into a written contract, by the terms of which the appellant agreed to furnish all the necessary materials, and erect and finish for the respondent a court house and jail, for the consideration of $270,000. The contract provided that the work should be performed under the direction and to the satisfaction of Proctor & Dennis, architects, acting as agents of the respondent, who should, “as the work proceeds,” furnish estimates of the value of the work done and material…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Baker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  2. Thomas v. BarnesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Arnott v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Badders & Britt v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Athearn v. Independent District of MillersburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Rosellini v. BancheroWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Dyer v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Tacoma & Eastern Lumber Co. v. Field & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Wallis v. Inhabitants of WenhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Johnson v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1901

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API