Legal Opinion
Rowe v. Rennick
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1931No. Docket No. 4189PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE PLUMMER Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant in the sum of $10,800, for and on account of personal injuries suffered in an automobile collision alleged to be due to the negligence of the defendant. Prom this judgment the defendant appeals.
The complaint alleges that on or about the seventeenth day of March, 1929, the plaintiff was riding in a certain automobile which was being driven in a southerly direction along the state highway running between the towns of Pair-field and Cordelia, in the county of Solano; that on the same day the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Dunning v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- King v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Fleming v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Formosa v. Yellow Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.