Legal Opinion
King v. Wilson
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 19, 1931No. Docket No. 452PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, J., pro tem.
The first of these two actions grew out of the ordinary automobile accident in which the plaintiff Rosebelle King, a minor, was severely injured and was awarded judgment against both defendants. In the second case the plaintiff Lueile H. King, the mother of Rosebelle King, recovered judgment against both defendants for medical and hospital expenses. The two cases were by stipulation of all parties consolidated and tried together. Prom these judgments defendant Ralph Wilson urges this appeal, the defendant Roy Downs not appealing.
The first error assigned by appellant is that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnston v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Lahti v. McMenaminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- McPhee v. LavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Harris v. . BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Walter v. EnglandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Santa Clara Department of Social Services v. Cecilia M.California Court of Appeal · 1986
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.