Legal Opinion
Fleming v. Flick
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 19, 1934No. Civ. No. 5071PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment for damages which was rendered against them for injuries sustained by the plaintiff as the result of an automobile casualty caused by the defendants’ machine colliding with the plaintiff’s ear while it was stalled 'on the roadside because of a broken axle.
*18The evidence is conflicting, but the record supports the following statement of facts: At 2 o’clock on the morning of August 24, 1932, the plaintiff was engaged in hauling five head of cattle to a mountain ranch in Placer County. He was driving his Harmon automobile which had been converted into a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Rath v. BankstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Silvey v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Straten v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- West v. Johnson & Johnson Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- McCullough v. LangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. Kelley (1937)California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Toomes v. NunesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.