Legal Opinion

Fuentes v. Tucker

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1947No. L. A. 20121; L. A. 20122PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

The minor sons of the respective plaintiffs were killed by an automobile operated by defendant. The two actions were consolidated for trial, and in each case the verdict of the jury awarded the plaintiffs $7,500. Defendant appealed from the judgments claiming the trial court erred in permitting plaintiffs to present evidence of facts outside the issues framed by the pleadings.

On the day of the trial defendant filed an amended answer in each case which admitted “that he was and is liable for the death of the deceased . . . and the damages directly and proximately caused thereby.” Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Kurn v. CountsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API