Legal Opinion
Formosa v. Yellow Cab Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1939No. Civ. 10494PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The respondent, Frank Formosa, recovered a judgment against the defendants, Yellow Cab Company, and its employee, Thomas C. O’Brien, and Thomas W. Gilboy, transacting business under the firm name of Gilboy Co., and his employee, Henry Lane, for the sum of $25,000.
At about 12:45 A. M., on the morning of May 8, 1936, the respondent, Frank Formosa, engaged a taxicab owned and operated by the Yellow Cab Company and being driven by Thomas C. O’Brien, to convey him from the Mission district in the city of San Francisco to Larkin and Turk Streets in said city. The taxicab was proceeding…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- O'Meara v. HaidenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Mohn v. TingleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Morgan v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mecchi v. Lyon Van & Storage Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Brown v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Weddle v. LogesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Hyman v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Ford v. Carew & EnglishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.